Evaluative Report Part B
My development as a social networker
Studying INF506 has exposed me to a large number of social networking applications. The most prominent include resource sharing/bookmarking applications such as Delicious and Diigo, and maintaining a personal learning blog over the length of the course. However I also found the literature on second life very interesting. The potential of these virtual worlds for simulated training will only increase as the technology improves the accessibility usability and realism of these virtual worlds. I am also more cognoscente of the importance of establishing RSS feeds for organizing the flow of information to my home page from useful resources such as blogs and catalogues. For me this touches on the important issue of having the ability to personalize my home page for the purpose of aggregating resources and my most used applications into one convenient and accessible digital space. I remain skeptical of Facebook as a useful learning tool outside of its existing use for marketing and outreach. As important as marketing and outreach are they are not the main game in my view.
For libraries and information professional’s the power of the new technologies reside in its ability to connect documents and people together in new and dynamic ways. Libraries are now leveraging the strengths of social networking technologies to do this. During the course of INF 506 I have become familiar with a number of initiatives that have great promise. Many academic libraries are now introducing dynamic and immersive teaching tools and improved OPAC usability. Pod cats, screen cast and video casting are now commonly used to teach information literacy skills to new users such as undergraduates. Libraries are also now in the process of incorporating a range of digital tools like social tagging/bookmarking and RSS applications into their catalogues to improve their effectiveness in linking resources to communities of users. The potential of direct user publishing and tagging of documents for digital collections is only starting to be realized and utilized by libraries and the learning communities they serve. However the digital repositories and the digital commons have a far way to go before they challenge the existing publishing regime with all its associated legal restrictions and expenses.
In conclusion I think that information professionals do have to be careful in their selection of technologies and digital tools. The fads need to be separated from the resources that will bring value. How will new tools develop existing resources and capacities? Will the costs associated with developing and implementing new tools and the hardware that supports them come at the expense of existing stacks and print collections? Many libraries are now disposing of their print collections and or removing shelf space for other purposes and programs. Stacks and print collections do have real immeasurable value. To my mind the levels of utilization are not predicator of ultimate cultural and intellectual value of a given document. The real value will be to develop tools for bringing these underutilized items and cultural artifacts to the attention of a new generation of digital users.
.jpg)